Quote:
Originally Posted by davesmith
Does anyone have any feedback as to whether it is a quicker review process for a company rather than an individual, or vice versa?
Also is it quicker for subsequent apps once your first app has been approved?
Cheers
Dave
|
From other conversations, I don't believe it's any quicker as a company. Even EA and Atari have to go through testing and compliance, but you can expect their own internal QA will make it a smoother ride as the submissions will be better documented (particularly path to completion and finding features, when applicable/important) and will be tested more thoroughly than the average 'indie' submission. Having a voice contact will also help of course: Never underestimate the power of verbal communication - everyone in business should know not to rely on email.
As for re-submissions (regarding rejections), it sort of makes sense that they will take longer. It's nothing personal, but the volume of submissions probably means there are two qeues: First Chance and Second Chance. New subs, to be fair, should be processed quickly as possible. Apps that have been rejected, and re-submitted, by proxy will be treated as "could still have problems" ... otherwise the turnover would be impaired by apps that never get their problems fixed (however many that may be - it could be a few, it could be hundreds!).
