Advertise Mobile SDKs Books Events Forum News Social Networking Support Us
Follow @iphonedevsdk on Twitter

Interface 2, Advanced iOS
Mockup & Code Gen
($9.99)

Make your own iPhone apps
and run them live!
(free)

Pic Frame Dynamo: Photo Editing
($0.99)

Abiliator
($1.99)

Want your application or service advertised on iPhone Dev SDK?

Go Back   iPhone Dev SDK Forum

View Single Post
Old 01-14-2010, 08:26 PM   #44 (permalink)
Shmoopi
Shmoopi LLC
 
Shmoopi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Virginia
Posts: 213
Shmoopi is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by !_UK@$ View Post
Really thanks a lot for sharing all the anticrack things for free. I have one lame questions, what should I do when the code get known that the app has been pirated? Close the app - how? Thanks
You should do anything that you want to do. If you want to close the app, go ahead and close it by using some of the closing methods listed in the bottom of this tutorial, likewise, if you want to put advertisements, popups, or anything else in there, feel free. This is your app, do whatever you want!
Ultimately though, I would think about what you would do as a cracker if the developer had implemented whatever method you use when you detect it's pirated. Would you be mad? Sad? Frustrated? Think about it from the opposite perspective.

Quote:
Originally Posted by F.R.E.E. View Post
I am having strange problems with the following preprocessor commands

Code:
#if TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR || defined(DEBUG) || (!defined(NS_BLOCK_ASSERTIONS) && !defined(NDEBUG))
    return;
#endif
when compiled in release mode and run on the device, I still hit the return code, and the debugger check is effectively disabled.

If I comment out the return statement
Code:
#if TARGET_IPHONE_SIMULATOR || defined(DEBUG) || (!defined(NS_BLOCK_ASSERTIONS) && !defined(NDEBUG))
//    return;
#endif
then the debugger check is executed.

Anyone else have this issue?
Very interesting. I'm going to have to take a lot closer look at the Encryption check method that I've provided. It looks like their should be a more reliable way to implement this check. Thanks, for the comment F.R.E.E., I'll post here when it's updated.
Shmoopi is offline   Reply With Quote
 

» Advertisements
» Online Users: 450
16 members and 434 guests
baja_yu, David-T, edvaniojancy, esoteric, HemiMG, iGuessSo, ilmman, jimmyon122, malaki1974, mediaspree, PixelEnvision, shigaugi, Sloshmonster, speed4mee, thebeast, ximagin
Most users ever online was 1,387, 04-10-2012 at 04:21 AM.
» Stats
Members: 175,432
Threads: 94,026
Posts: 402,587
Top Poster: BrianSlick (7,978)
Welcome to our newest member, ximagin
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.1.0

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:15 PM.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.0
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.